Our approach

What makes our research different

Evaluation frameworks, a standard delivery model, digital quality control and research ethics — applied to every study.

Women seated around a room in a group discussion
Principles

Four principles behind every study

Human-centred research

Studies designed around how people live, decide and experience systems — not around data extraction.

Ethical and transparent practice

Informed consent, confidentiality and data integrity from scoping through dissemination.

Deep sectoral expertise

Research, public policy, analytics and implementation experience across development systems.

Action-oriented insight

Complex findings converted into recommendations usable by governments, funders and delivery teams.

“From crowded urban settlements to remote hamlets — data has meaning only when it reflects human experience.”
Evaluation competence

Evaluation frameworks we deliver

Programme evaluations across the full intervention cycle, and study designs for causal, longitudinal and synthesised evidence.

Across the programme cycle

  1. Before intervention

    Baseline assessment

    The present condition, benchmarked for indicator comparison before intervention.

  2. During implementation

    Midline evaluation

    A checkpoint on performance and implementation gaps, to inform course correction.

  3. After implementation

    Endline and impact assessment

    Efficacy, coverage and relevance measured against baseline for targeted populations.

Study designs

Randomised controlled trials

Control and intervention groups randomly assigned for causal evidence of impact.

Cohort study

Group comparison over time to relate exposure to long-term population outcomes.

Meta-analysis and systematic review

Qualitative and quantitative evidence merged for robust, generalisable conclusions.

Delivery model

Standard project implementation pathway

Four phases, each closing with defined deliverables for the client.

  1. Phase 1

    Inception and desk review

    Kick-off and approach alignment, desk review of data and literature, indicator criteria and geography strategy.

    DeliverablesDraft inception report · work plan · desk review report

  2. Phase 2

    Tool design and piloting

    Questionnaires and guides finalised, regional language translation, CAPI development, pilot test and review.

    DeliverablesFinal tools in English and local languages · CAPI instruments · pilot report

  3. Phase 3

    Field preparation and data collection

    Enumerator training and briefing, interviews per field movement plan, spot and back checks, daily server uploads.

    DeliverablesCompletion report · daily activity summaries · live dashboard

  4. Phase 4

    Analysis and reporting

    Transcription and translation, analysis plan, framework and thematic analysis, triangulation, draft to final report.

    DeliverablesTop-line findings · draft and final report · presentation deck

CAPI and quality assurance

Digital collection and quality control

Every interview moves through the same digital chain, with checks applied at each link.

  1. Step 1Respondent interview
  2. Step 2GPS capture
  3. Step 3Server upload
  4. Step 4Dashboard monitoring

Location validation

GPS confirms the interview location and monitors the interviewer's travel route.

Interview duration

Length checked against benchmarks; short interviews and rushing are flagged.

Response quality

Screening for straight-lining, open-ended review, and noted answers matched to actual responses.

Recording verification

Audio and video verify interview conduct within designated time windows.

Respondent verification

Socioeconomic categories verified, no-skips enforced, quotas validated against profile.

Daily oversight loops

Regular debriefs, server uploads, dashboard reports and activity summaries.

Research ethics

Ethical protocols and data protection

A rigorous ethical framework ensures respondent dignity, data protection and transparent engagement at every stage of every project.

Informed consent

Free, prior and informed consent based on a clear explanation of purpose, use and rights.

Voluntary participation

Freedom to decline or stop at any point. No persuasion, pressure or incentives.

Privacy and confidentiality

Identity held strictly confidential; interviews conducted in safe, private settings.

Respect and dignity

Respondents engaged as partners in the process, with cultural sensitivity throughout.

Safe environment

Physical and psychological safety verified before any interview commences.

Data integrity

Coding, validation and triangulation under ethical protocol. Zero tolerance for fabrication.

Work with us

Let evidence move from field to policy.

Share your terms of reference or a short brief. We'll respond with a preliminary proposal, scope and timeline.